Revision is one of the most critical stages in the publication process. While addressing reviewer comments improves a manuscript, poorly managed revisions can disrupt structure, clarity, and logical flow. Top journals emphasize that effective revision is not just about adding changes it is about integrating them seamlessly. For Ubiquitous Technology Journal (UTJ), maintaining coherence during…
Receiving reviewer comments is a defining moment in the academic publishing journey. While feedback may sometimes feel critical or overwhelming, how authors respond determines whether a manuscript progresses toward acceptance or faces rejection. In Ubiquitous Technology Journal (UTJ), authors are expected to respond with clarity, professionalism, and precision. A well-crafted response not only improves the…
After submitting a manuscript, one of the most anticipated and often misunderstood moments is receiving the editorial decision. Terms like minor revision, major revision, and reject may seem straightforward, but they carry specific academic meanings that determine your manuscript’s future. For authors publishing in technology-driven journals like Ubiquitous Technology Journal (UTJ), understanding these decisions is…
